3 ms·
This is not true. Large language models have cracked the "multiple degrees of semantic relation" problem. I'd put money on gpt-3 being able to handle any partic
by robbedpeter 5y ago
This is not true. Large language models have cracked the "multiple degrees of semantic relation" problem. I'd put money on gpt-3 being able to handle any particular problem you put forward, with the caveat being that multiple passes and diligent work with prompt construction will be needed more often than not (a single pass naive zero-shot might occasionally succeed, but a generalized sequence of passes can solve almost any problem class you care to define.)
- YPPH 5y agoI don't agree and have real doubt that what you say is good enough for real world use. I hear the similar claims from people who think AI is good enough for sentencing people, it's absolutely not, like contractual construction it's a process where human values are at the forefront. You can't throw law and facts at it and expect a sensible result. Contract as code might have beguiling simplicity but really intractable complexity. At the heart of it is the issues caused by the challenging concept of fairness which is distinctly and exclusively human.
- leobg 5y agoWhew. What does it mean to gave an AI that can solve any problem, as long as you play around with your prompt long enough until the result is correct? Also, GPT-3 has this temperature setting. As long as that is a set to zero, each time you run, you’ll get a different result, even with exactly the same inputs.