3 ms·
There's also UI trends in the opposite direction, encouraging users not to read a contract at all. After "signing" a location, DocuSign will automatically scro
by MereInterest 5y ago
There's also UI trends in the opposite direction, encouraging users not to read a contract at all. After "signing" a location, DocuSign will automatically scroll to the next place requiring a "signature". In order to actually read the contract, you must scroll back to the earlier location.
Or, the inability to mark up a contract while going through it. With a physical contract, changes can be written in and initialed. In DocuSign, any changes require an out-of-band communication, adjustment by the party preparing the contract, and re-issuing. There's no reason that it couldn't be handled in-band, with changes inserted, highlighted, and sent back for the other party to sign. Instead, it only presents the option of signing as-is.
- walrus01 5y agothat's just terrible all around. I'm glad that at least some docusign competitors exist. Docusign pricing is also nuts for what you get. It does seem to have become entrenched as the default choice by office admin people who don't know anything else exists. you know something has gone wrong when a subscription based adobe product has better pricing than docusign.
- dannyw 5y agoDocuSign is for contract execution. You shouldn't send a packet unless both parties are willing to execute.