4 ms·

I think it’s clear that there is nothing to support your claim that there is any ‘international law’ that establishes that Taiwan is part of the mainland. It i

by zepto 5y ago

I think it’s clear that there is nothing to support your claim that there is any ‘international law’ that establishes that Taiwan is part of the mainland. It is literally only a position of the CCP and nothing more. As I have pointed out, your account was created three years ago, but was silent until a couple of hours ago, when you have used it only to support the claim that Taiwan is part of mainland China, never commenting on anything else.

newbear1 5y ago
- zepto 5y ago
  > If you want to advance the idea that it's only China mainland had this idea of Taiwan is part of China, then you already made a US centric view that is very likely to be wrong. As I said elsewhere - if you can provide us a link to this international law, we can discuss it, and we can see if I am wrong. As it is, it is clear that there is no international law establishing that Taiwan is part of China, and nothing you can point to. Once again, I will mention that you created this throwaway account 3 years ago, and only activated it in the last few hours to make comments solely supporting the CCP’s claim to Taiwan.
  - newbear1 5y ago
    - zepto 5y ago
      >> CCP’s claim to Taiwan. > That's China mainland's claim No, it’s the CCP. The CCP is the government of the mainland and it is the government that makes the claim. > throw away accounts have no connection to a particular point of view. If you say so, but then can you explain why you created a throwaway account 3 years ago, only to use it now only for the purpose of defending the CCP’s claim to Taiwan?
      - newbear1 5y ago
        deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
        zepto 5y ago
        > CCP/China that's the same thing. You might want separate you cannot separate your head from your body. You contradicted me earlier when I called it the CCP’s claim, so I guess you have changed your mind. > The throw away account. I don't get it. Throw away are created for temporary use. After this episode of chat, this account will disappear. I just have quite a few I created in a whim, and use any one from the Google password manager. Ahh so you created quite a few accounts all at one time, 3 years ago, and you use a different one each time you want to present the CCPs point of view. That makes sense. > Lastly, your reasoning of questioning other's motivation through minor details are really killing the conversation. I’m not questioning your motivation. You have been clear about that. I am simply trying to understand the method. By creating a set of throwaway accounts to use later, you avoid them appearing to be new accounts which show up in green at the time you use them, which makes it less likely people will notice that they are throwaways.

by zepto 5y ago

newbear1 5y ago

zepto 5y ago
> If you want to advance the idea that it's only China mainland had this idea of Taiwan is part of China, then you already made a US centric view that is very likely to be wrong. As I said elsewhere - if you can provide us a link to this international law, we can discuss it, and we can see if I am wrong. As it is, it is clear that there is no international law establishing that Taiwan is part of China, and nothing you can point to. Once again, I will mention that you created this throwaway account 3 years ago, and only activated it in the last few hours to make comments solely supporting the CCP’s claim to Taiwan.
- newbear1 5y ago
  - zepto 5y ago
    >> CCP’s claim to Taiwan. > That's China mainland's claim No, it’s the CCP. The CCP is the government of the mainland and it is the government that makes the claim. > throw away accounts have no connection to a particular point of view. If you say so, but then can you explain why you created a throwaway account 3 years ago, only to use it now only for the purpose of defending the CCP’s claim to Taiwan?
    - newbear1 5y ago
      - deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
      - zepto 5y ago
        > CCP/China that's the same thing. You might want separate you cannot separate your head from your body. You contradicted me earlier when I called it the CCP’s claim, so I guess you have changed your mind. > The throw away account. I don't get it. Throw away are created for temporary use. After this episode of chat, this account will disappear. I just have quite a few I created in a whim, and use any one from the Google password manager. Ahh so you created quite a few accounts all at one time, 3 years ago, and you use a different one each time you want to present the CCPs point of view. That makes sense. > Lastly, your reasoning of questioning other's motivation through minor details are really killing the conversation. I’m not questioning your motivation. You have been clear about that. I am simply trying to understand the method. By creating a set of throwaway accounts to use later, you avoid them appearing to be new accounts which show up in green at the time you use them, which makes it less likely people will notice that they are throwaways.