5 ms·
This was renters insurance pushed by the landlord. Perhaps it’s the barebones the landlord was OK with (e.g. if I burn down the house cooking or create a flood
by jdavis703 5y ago
This was renters insurance pushed by the landlord. Perhaps it’s the barebones the landlord was OK with (e.g. if I burn down the house cooking or create a flood changing the plumbing they get paid out and don’t give a crap about what happens outside of normal tenant-caused disasters).
- dpark 5y agoWhat? Renter’s insurance should cover your losses, not the landlord’s.
- cmurf 5y agoIt covers renter's liability too. Whether by accident or negligence, you can be held liable for damages to other people's property.
- simplestats 5y agoIt pays the landlord if they sue you and win. That's why they require it commonly. Some landlords even require tenants to cover them with your insurance as additional insured (I think this is stupid). Though it is common for business leases I believe.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> Renter’s insurance should cover your losses, not the landlord’s Renter’s, like homeowner’s, insurance, usually includes some liability coverage. The landlord is a particularly likely person for a renter to have liabilities to.
- dpark 5y agoThat’s fair. I was originally thinking in terms of external events (such as the riot mentioned). But sure, liability for the renter setting the place on fire makes sense.