4 ms·
Yes. We should do that. We won't. Pro: everyone is fine, the hospitals aren't overwhelmed, the anti-vaxxers will be fine along with everyone else. Con: can't
by philovivero 5y ago
Yes. We should do that. We won't.
Pro: everyone is fine, the hospitals aren't overwhelmed, the anti-vaxxers will be fine along with everyone else.
Con: can't speak with disgust and disdain anymore to those who disagree with your medical opinions, or have concerns with how quickly you're forcing your experimental medications on the entire planet.
Not going to happen. I've already seen the usual suspects talking about how we need bigger, better, stronger vaccines for Omicron.
We're pretty excited by this RNA vaccine tech, and we're going to use it, no matter what happens.
There's too much money and too much political power on the pro-vax anti-immune-system side of things.
- pavel_lishin 5y ago> everyone is fine Except the people who aren't. > the hospitals aren't overwhelmed Except the ones that are. > forcing your experimental medications on the entire planet No more experimental than any other vaccine; due to how quickly COVID spread, we were able to do the same level of testing on the vaccine as for any other medication. It's as safe as anything else you take.
- tonguez 5y ago“No more experimental than any other vaccine” you are creating more vaccine hesitancy by saying this
- donkarma 5y agovaccine trials usually last 2 years alone from a quick glance
- pavel_lishin 5y agoBecause most vaccines are for diseases that aren't as prevalent in the population as COVID has been; we've had significantly more people to run the trials on!
- choward 5y agoTo your first two points, you could say that before covid. Do you have a time machine or something? You can't study long term effects just by having a bigger study.