3 ms·
>Understatement of the year. You are a dev who wants to make some money on the side and keeps her software proprietary because monetizing open-source is a rare
by widespace_ 5y ago
>Understatement of the year. You are a dev who wants to make some money on the side and keeps her software proprietary because monetizing open-source is a rare exception than the rule? F!@# her and her lack of ethics! And don’t touch her software, or her, with a 10 foot pole, let alone pay for it!
Are you asking for the free software foundation to support proprietary software?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- MaxBarraclough 5y agoI think that's just the point here: yes, strictly speaking they are, but practically speaking the alternative is to put the user's cybersecurity at risk. If you ask just about any user, they will say they prioritise their cybersecurity over the purity of their Free Software stack. The FSF seemingly disagree. That disagreement is an important one.
- Ygg2 5y agoI don't know. You can spin a lot of stuff as cyber security. Hosting all stuff in cloud does prevent getting locked by some ransom ware. Plus security isn't an absolute. A determined enough actor could always hack you.