4 ms·
Every time I see an article about the advance of AI, with the vague sci-fi theme of "AI is now so good it is about to replace humans" I think of the many, many
by lkrubner 5y ago
Every time I see an article about the advance of AI, with the vague sci-fi theme of "AI is now so good it is about to replace humans" I think of the many, many stories I've heard like yours, where the FAANG seem unable to build even basic statistical systems, nevermind AI. Some articles suggest AI is on the verge of human sentience, meanwhile, in real life, I constantly encounter stupid algorithms, even from big companies with lots of money. The advertising companies are the worst. I bought a guitar and then, for the next 6 months, every ad I saw on every site was about guitars. How many guitars do they really think I'm going to buy in one year? It's really a once-every-two-or-three-years purchase, it doesn't justify the saturation I was exposed to.
Or elevators. I'm in New York City and everyday I go into some building that has a terrible algorithm for its elevators. I don't need advanced AI, my life would be improved with even minor tweaks to most algorithms for elevators.
- visarga 5y agoDon't blame the algorithms, blame the people who decide policy. It's perfectly possible to find a ton of spammers in Google, FB and Twitter by manual and/or automated methods. Their continued existence shows they are tolerated.
- mulmen 5y agoIt’s actually very simple. In the era of big data nobody looks at opportunity cost because you can’t put a KPI on it.
- dralley 5y ago> "AI is now so good it is about to replace humans" Clearly how good it is (not) is not an impediment to being pushed upon us and replacing humans. FAANG certainly seem to prefer the low cost over the quality of the results.