Maybe this should be a new litmus test for patents. If you can't explain what your patent is, its value, and how its being infringed to a reasonably intelligent

Maybe this should be a new litmus test for patents. If you can't explain what your patent is, its value, and how its being infringed to a reasonably intelligent person (a judge) then its not patentable. I mean if the judge needs an expert to explain it to him, who the heck is reviewing these things for approval.