Is this a meta argument or a commentary? The author, I read, has more of a commentary than an argument. If it's a commentary, then discussion stops there beca

Is this a meta argument or a commentary? The author, I read, has more of a commentary than an argument. If it's a commentary, then discussion stops there because it's preloaded with bias. If it's meta, then we're working with inflammatory language like "sucker" which ignores the moral nuance of the subject matter. The... "looting" that the author is referring to is equivalent to bumping a car when trying to parallel park. I'm really trying to wrap my head around your comment.