3 ms·
A lot of the complexity of the python code is hidden by the Geo* methods you have here; a more representative comparison would show how those methods are implem
by idealmedtech 5y ago
A lot of the complexity of the python code is hidden by the Geo* methods you have here; a more representative comparison would show how those methods are implemented (eg with the shape files).
- Jon_McLoone 5y agoBut that is the point of the Wolfram Language. If you are doing work with computation or data, it should be just built-in.
- Jon_McLoone 5y agoActually, handling .shp files is also just built-in... https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/format/SHP.html https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/format/SHP.html
- aflag 5y agoThere is a lot of complexity hidden in the R functions as well. The reason of using higher level languages with comprehensive standard libraries is exactly to abstract these things away. So, I think it's fair to say that, for this particular problem, wolfram language is better suited.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]