3 ms·

squash merge is evil

• usr1106 5y ago
  The author should squash useless commits. A readable series of commits is put to review. At merging to a commonly used branch no more squashing.
  • cerved 5y ago
    Why? Why doesn't the author make commits that are not useless? Why squash everything into a single commit? Why not 2 commits, 3, 5?
• reidjs 5y ago
  I feel differently, why don’t you like it?
  • notfed 5y ago
    The above-posted scenario is a great reason to hate it. It's destroying developers' documented rationale for each change.
  • cerved 5y ago
    it destroys information for no good reason