4 ms·
Consider the question: how would a spacefaring civilization travel between stars? If, like me, you believe that: 1. The speed of light is a hard cosmic light;
by cletus 5y ago
Consider the question: how would a spacefaring civilization travel between stars?
If, like me, you believe that:
1. The speed of light is a hard cosmic light; and
2. The laws of thermodynamics can't be violated.
then you're left with the problem that it will take an awful long time to travel to even the nearest stars, such that it really wouldn't be a journey at all. It would be a way of life.
Anything involving reaction mass seems to be a nonstarter unless you're going to take tens of thousands of years to get anywhere so that leaves two plausible options.
The first is stellar highways. That is you use the energy from a star to propel (and slow down) interstellar vessels. This solves the reaction mass problem. This method almost requires nuclear fusion to be viable however. Many people assume it will be. I'm not saying it won't be but I'm not yet convinced it will be. The problems are massive. Why do you need fusion? Well you probably need waystations between stars and something has to power those.
The second option is... interstellar bodies. I'm talking large comets, asteroids and, of course, rogue planets. You don't need to spend inordinate amounts of energy to accelerate and decelerate them. Obviously you still have to match their velocity when they pass by but that's a lot easier to do with a much smaller object.
A large rocky object with even a modicum of ice will have all you need to house a large population for the journey of tens of thousands of years until it passes by another star.
I really think the first interstellar humans will be hitchhikers on rogue planets.
- dogma1138 5y agoFusion drives would still need reaction mass.
- dredmorbius 5y agoWhat does a large body buy you that you con't get by accelerating directly? An interstellar craft orbiting a Rogue Jupiter ... doesn't have a planetary surface to land on, might benefit by available material from the giant itself (most notably hydrogen gas, a potential fuel, energy source, and component in replacing water). There might be captured moons affording other materials (mostly lighter elements presumably). There might be a slight gain in being able to gravitationally slingshot to or from the giant. Otherwise, going it alone seems generally more advantageous.
- jerrre 5y agoThe journey is long compared to our lifespans, you could also try to change the latter to make space travel less impacting
- marcus_holmes 5y agoI guess it's the difference between "I, a human, can travel between stars", or "We, the human race, can travel between stars". Sending off people to go colonise other systems, without ever knowing if they succeed or not (well, I guess they could send back a radio signal, but it would arrive thousands, if not millions of years later). I'm not sure that humans have the kind of longevity as a species needed for this.
- loonster 5y agoIt's a futuristic retelling of Moses.