3 ms·
Of course not, it’s a free service that’s paid for by them displaying ads over your content. It’s so depressing that that isn’t even satire but an actual real t
by olliej 5y ago
Of course not, it’s a free service that’s paid for by them displaying ads over your content. It’s so depressing that that isn’t even satire but an actual real thing.
- dylan604 5y agoIf they can make money on the sale of the item AND then make more money by selling your viewing habits from using the item, why not increase with a subscription remote service? The idea isn't any less asinine than the Toyota ploy. With the service, you can click channels up or down. Without, you can only change channels in one direction which forces you to view all channels similar to the scene in Toy Story. This also gives all channels impressions, so it would benefit them. Who cares about the user. Also with the service, the keypad on the remote can also be enabled so you can dial in the channel number directly. This is an upgrade of the basice service to the Pro version for an extra small nominal fee.
- olliej 5y agoThe joke was that Samsung already puts ads on peoples TVs despite them having paid for the TV.