It's a fair critique. But I think the maintenance and dependencies for a website are the main reason a lot of them die off (basically, the owner giving up on it

It's a fair critique. But I think the maintenance and dependencies for a website are the main reason a lot of them die off (basically, the owner giving up on it because the cost to keep it up is higher than the value it provides the owner). Intentionally killing a website seems rare to me otherwise. > whether you compress your site It's actually a comment against minimizing the html/css content, which makes it unreadable and adds an extra step in your toolchain (another point of failure). > Anyways, this appears to be a pitch for a project I did add that link recently as it's related, but I wrote this Designed to Last article 2 years before irchiver. See the previous discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21840140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21840140