4 ms·
I applaud and encourage anything that rewrites managed junk code to proper native code But in this particular case, i think GO would have been a much better al
by Shadonototra 5y ago
I applaud and encourage anything that rewrites managed junk code to proper native code
But in this particular case, i think GO would have been a much better alternative, we'll see how it goes in the long term
- pkolaczk 5y agoWhy do you think so?
- Shadonototra 5y agobecause it's CPU and memory efficient no GC no JIT, server starts instantly, you need to allocate less resources, and it's easier to install, no runtime dependencies, usually, if done correctly
- pkolaczk 5y agoWhy did you write Go would be a better alternative then? You say "no GC" as an advantage, but Go relies on GC.
- Shadonototra 5y agoi listed above my preferences; as to why i applaud anything rewritten that meet those requirements but i am not closed minded, i understand pros/cons of each features in that particular case, a GC is helpful even though i'm personally against it i'm being objective rather than subjective whenever i have to make a choice or a suggestion