> Uses original nacl-20110221 source. Considering the website[0] starts with "WARNING: This signature software (both at the C level and at the C++ level) is a

> Uses original nacl-20110221 source. Considering the website[0] starts with "WARNING: This signature software (both at the C level and at the C++ level) is a prototype. It will be replaced by the final system Ed25519 in future NaCl releases. A NaCl-compatible Ed25519 implementation is already available as part of SUPERCOP," I'm not convinced that using the original NaCl source for signing is a good sign. [0] https://nacl.cr.yp.to/sign.html https://nacl.cr.yp.to/sign.html