3 ms·
I think the impact is near zero but not zero. For example, it might mean someone has to work a year longer before accumulating wealth and retiring. The benefit
by profile53 5y ago
I think the impact is near zero but not zero.
For example, it might mean someone has to work a year longer before accumulating wealth and retiring. The benefit far outweighs the cost, but the cost is still there.
Taxes are inherently a restriction on what one can do with their money. That said, without them we wouldn’t have roads, police, healthcare, social security, etc…which does add freedom to many peoples lives. I think another comment said it best, laws can increase overall freedom in a society, but they do still restrict individuals.
- actually_a_dog 5y agoI don't understand whether you're agreeing or disagreeing with me.
- profile53 5y agoSorry, that was poorly explained. I’m agreeing that the overall benefit to society is positive. But, I disagree that the impact to the individual is essentially zero.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]