6 ms·
I have been looking into this lately for a company that wanted to host important data on AWS S3. I couldn’t find conclusive information in public domain. It’s
by aborsy 5y ago
I have been looking into this lately for a company that wanted to host important data on AWS S3. I couldn’t find conclusive information in public domain.
It’s hard to decipher the AWS Data Privacy policy:
https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/data-privacy-faq/ https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/data-privacy-faq/
In section Who Owns Customer Content, it’s implied that AWS doesn’t access customers’ data:
“As a customer, you maintain ownership of your content, and you select which AWS services can process, store, and host your content. We do not access or use your content for any purpose without your agreement. We never use customer content or derive information from it for marketing or advertising.”
Here, the statement is we don’t access customer’s data without customer’s agreement. But customers do agree with ToS in which different statements might be included.
In another place it’s mentioned, if governments request, AWS will comply. Considering that governments obviously request access from cloud providers, and obviously require them not to disclose the backdoor, I came to the conclusion that governments have unconditional access to data held in data centers of companies such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft.
As for non-government access, there are claims that Amazon uses data or metadata to launch competing products. If I recall correctly, AWS may collect some data presumably to maintain and secure the platform and fight abuse. The counter argument is that, AWS will not risk a profitable business; but AWS is too big to be easily impacted and might act on good opportunities.
It would be great if people working in AWS or similar platforms could chime in.
- Spooky23 5y agoWhen you think about risks it’s productive to understand what could happen vs what may. I was a stakeholder in an early cloud negotiation back in 2010-11, and one of the key issues was the support personnel. Ultimately, they have access to your data.
- luckylion 5y ago> AWS doesn’t access customers’ data Amazon's product people also don't look at third party seller statistics to decide which products to sell themselves. Until they got caught doing just that. To assume that they don't look at data feels naive. A German super market chain with online ambitions has a rule that nothing touching their pipeline can be hosted on AWS. Want to sell them SaaS? You can't run your nodes on AWS. I consider that to be reasonable.
- jen20 5y agoAFAIK Walmart has that rule too.
- e1g 5y agoYes, they do - we pitched to them, and they said for our talks to continue we’d need to use another cloud (at least for their tenancy).
- geoduck14 5y agoThey do have that rule. And my previous company boasted that they signed a contract with us even though we used AWS. It was a pretty big deal, IMHO.
- z3j4e 5y ago> A German super market chain Which one? I would like to support non-AWS-companies.
- detaro 5y agoLidl
- pixiemaster 5y agoThey started the Schwarz Group Cloud (Stackit), 8000 developers and yet not a single production ready service yet.
- darkwater 5y agoSo, is this fake? https://www.stackit.de/en/cloud/products-services/ https://www.stackit.de/en/cloud/products-services/
- pixiemaster 5y agono, definitly not. but Lidl don‘t run a single production service on it yet.