5 ms·
LG’s 16:18 ultra-tall monitor means less scrolling
- Tepix 5y agoIt's really bad for your neck if the upper edge of the monitor is higher than your eye level. In Europe Huawei sells the MateView, a slick 28.2" 3:2 3.840 x 2.560 monitor. Its monitor stand does not support pivot.
- mixmastamyk 5y agoKinda weird, remember my 4:3 in portrait mode fondly. 16:10 might be decent.
- vmception 5y agoAre Gen-X'ers still thinking the user's creating vertical videos are the problem instead of the user experience of viewing vertical videos? Seems they were the only ones ever passionate about protesting this and 'correcting' users. But on the user experience side, this monitor seems to take this concept to an extreme!
- jdlshore 5y ago> Are Gen-X’ers still thinking Please don’t do this. You can make your point without resorting to stereotypes.
- 0xdeadb00f 5y agoThe way you've quoted this I almost thought you were implying "stop right there. Gen-X'ers don't think" ;P
- vmception 5y agoAlright alright, I had meant some, #notall, and thats it’s peculiar that it seemed generational
- nsonha 5y agoMet a few Gen-Xes who think more worldly than myself and know what a CD is, among other things. We should not make social media think what's on there is representative of society or any particular generation.
- saurik 5y agoI mean, if you want to take it to the actual "extreme", just get a normal widescreen monitor you can rotate to portrait (as opposed to this slightly squarer panel). I have one to the left of my normal monitor, and I use it mostly for chat apps and documentation for the work I'm doing on my main monitor.
- nsonha 5y agono you would have to get a monitor big enough to do that and still have a comfortable width. As manufacturer makes more of those ultrawides and alike these days, it's actually not easy to find a monitor that's good for use as a SINGLE vertical screen
- saurik 5y agoWell, trying to find a monitor that works well as a single monitor for other purposes sounds like the opposite of wanting to "take this concept to an extreme".
- nsonha 5y agoWhat do you mean "other purposes"? My only purpose of the monitor is for work. I need a monitor that's big enough and I don't like to have to make unnecessary head movements while working, hence vertical monitor. There is nothing extreme about it.
- elromulous 5y agoThe problem with vertical videos isn't the screen. The problem with vertical videos is our vision - our eyes are not stacked vertically.
- vmception 5y agoIt’s not recorded differently at that aspect ratio so it wouldn’t matter how our eyes are stacked. The image processor nor renderer does anything different for the experience to be different. No different than a crop.
- elromulous 5y agoIs this actually true? Are you saying the imager itself has a square ratio? Edit: So that's absolutely false. Imagers absolutely do not have a square aspect ratio. So it's not just about cropping. E.g. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exmor https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exmor
- neetrain 5y agoI love watching old films and playing old games, which are all 4:3 aspect ratio. Is this going to be a desirable option?
- ThatMedicIsASpy 5y ago16:18 just means 16:9 stacked on top of each other. my least desirable configuration of two monitors. If it were two actual 16:9 i could adjust and angle them properly.
- fargle 5y agocould I have a 16:12 instead please?
- ekianjo 5y agoErm, do people know you can turn at 90 degrees most of the regular monitors you buy these days? There is no point in buying a specific model for that.
- joshu 5y agothat’s not what this is
- Sander_Marechal 5y agoI knew my setup of 3 4:3 monitors side-by-side would be coming back into fashion!