Does your evidence of manipulated reporting consist entirely of adjusting the saturation of an image or is there anything more substantial? Just look at the sk

Does your evidence of manipulated reporting consist entirely of adjusting the saturation of an image or is there anything more substantial? Just look at the skin of the human being in both photos - the less saturated one looks 100% more natural (unless the guy actually has orange skin). If anything the over-saturated image is more misleading than the other, more dull, image. But neither are particularly egregious.