3 ms·
This may not mean Omicron is less severe itself. It may just be indicative of 70-80% of populations being prior infected or vaccinated like South Africa was. Un
by CyanLite4 5y ago
This may not mean Omicron is less severe itself. It may just be indicative of 70-80% of populations being prior infected or vaccinated like South Africa was. Unvaccinated individuals still have a tough time clearing this.
- rsfern 5y agoHave you seen any solid data about how unvaccinated individuals fare with omicron? I have been curious and it’s been hard to come by. This preprint from yesterday suggests basically what you’re saying, that underestimated prior immunity could possibly be a confounding factor in the models used to assess relative severity. But even that is still unclear at present https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.21.21268116 https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.21.21268116 Edit: table 3 in the imperial college preprint addresses this, they estimate hazard ratio of like 0.6-0.7 for unvaccinated, relative to delta
- dTal 5y agoThat's exactly the conflating factor that worries me. We know Omicron is much better at evading prior immunity, so we should expect a higher proportion of people with prior immunity among Omicron infections, which (all other things being equal) will make Omicron look less severe. But this would be illusory - the absolute number of severe infections wouldn't be less, they would just be diluted by mild infections that otherwise wouldn't have happened at all.