> If the objection is to surveillance of the students, I don't see how it would be any better to inform parents about participation in LGBTQ clubs There's a di

> If the objection is to surveillance of the students, I don't see how it would be any better to inform parents about participation in LGBTQ clubs There's a difference between simply not informing them and actively hiding the information from them. Aibgail implies they are doing the latter. She may be lying or misrepresenting things, but the latter is bad. What's being done here is heavy surveillance by the school, and the exclusion of that surveillance information from the parents. If the argument is that kids have no right to privacy, fine - share it with the parents. But regardless of the merit of the particular ideas under discussion now, they are a lot richer and more complex than simply telling kids "racism is bad".