3 ms·
That's a poor straw man. You can disagree with illiberal political takes and still support LGBTQ rights. Put another way, if a teacher isn't teaching the bible
by vorpalhex 5y ago
That's a poor straw man. You can disagree with illiberal political takes and still support LGBTQ rights.
Put another way, if a teacher isn't teaching the bible, clearly they are agents of the devil right?
It's the same poisonous fallacious logic that equivocates a policy position with basic moral character.
- aphistic 5y agoWhen the Bible, God, and the Devil are overwhelmingly backed by science, give me a call.
- klyrs 5y agoI'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this but it sounds like flamebait; please don't do that here.
- aphistic 5y agoThe example is a false equivalency, it's comparing teaching religion to teaching science.
- vorpalhex 5y agoChristianity exposes a binary: those who are not for me are against me. CRT theorists propose the same binary: those who are not pro-CRT support racism. It is possible to be against both racism and CRT. CRT is not scientific. It is ahistorical, based on storytelling and disagrees with basic fundamental statistics. It is a religion with followers and evangelists, demons and devils. It even has a salvation arc, original sin and the "sins of the father" as concepts. Blood guilt is not science.
- candiodari 5y agoHow are LGBTQ relationships overwhelmingly backed by science? It's a societal choice to allow or disallow them, and what the consequences are, no?