4 ms·
If any person notices evidence of domestic abuse or someone's aptitude they are liable to do what they can do support them. The context here is they're trying t
by jawerty 5y ago
If any person notices evidence of domestic abuse or someone's aptitude they are liable to do what they can do support them. The context here is they're trying to get to the child to influence them into their own worldview. Should we trust our public school teachers with that much responsibility? If your answer is yes, then you should ask yourself what would you do if the worldview was the one you hate the most.
- fknorangesite 5y agoIf the worldview you "hate the most" is one where LGBTQ kids are safe and loved and accepted, then forgive me if I don't have much sympathy for your position here.
- vorpalhex 5y agoThat's a poor straw man. You can disagree with illiberal political takes and still support LGBTQ rights. Put another way, if a teacher isn't teaching the bible, clearly they are agents of the devil right? It's the same poisonous fallacious logic that equivocates a policy position with basic moral character.
- aphistic 5y agoWhen the Bible, God, and the Devil are overwhelmingly backed by science, give me a call.
- klyrs 5y agoI'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this but it sounds like flamebait; please don't do that here.
- aphistic 5y agoThe example is a false equivalency, it's comparing teaching religion to teaching science.
- vorpalhex 5y agoChristianity exposes a binary: those who are not for me are against me. CRT theorists propose the same binary: those who are not pro-CRT support racism. It is possible to be against both racism and CRT. CRT is not scientific. It is ahistorical, based on storytelling and disagrees with basic fundamental statistics. It is a religion with followers and evangelists, demons and devils. It even has a salvation arc, original sin and the "sins of the father" as concepts. Blood guilt is not science.
- candiodari 5y agoHow are LGBTQ relationships overwhelmingly backed by science? It's a societal choice to allow or disallow them, and what the consequences are, no?
- sleighs 5y ago
- lern_too_spel 5y agoLet's be very specific. The teachers are teaching kids to be nice to each other. That's what you're objecting to here. Teaching kids to be nice to LGBT people or teaching kids that math is important are both "[influencing kids] into their own worldview." Be very specific about why you object to one and not the other.