3 ms·
Well one can argue that the Shanghai police was also quite transparent about it, given the following: > On May 21, a branch of the Shanghai police posted a not
by foverzar 5y ago
Well one can argue that the Shanghai police was also quite transparent about it, given the following:
> On May 21, a branch of the Shanghai police posted a notice online seeking bids from private contractors for what is known among Chinese officialdom as public opinion management.
- Tostino 5y agoOne would be disingenuous if they argued that.
- cscurmudgeon 5y agoDon't you see the difference between that and posting a notice on the Facebook domain visible to all?
- foverzar 5y agoI see what you mean, but it is only evident when you actually know of RF as a political entity. It's not as evident when they operate under localised brands posing as "just small local news". In Russia RF's news outlets were the ones who resisted the foreign funded media explicit labeling regulations the most and were the slowest to comply and start labeling their content explicitly. What I mean is their degree of transparency is quite debatable and raises some red flags.