I love the casualness about somebody wasting hundreds of dollars consulting a lawyer for something that isn’t relevant to them. As for the personal blog: it is

I love the casualness about somebody wasting hundreds of dollars consulting a lawyer for something that isn’t relevant to them. As for the personal blog: it is relevant, because the email was send to owners of personal blogs. You claimed that the recipients of this email, such as personal blog owners, had no business running a website if they didn’t know the details a law that doesn’t apply to them. That’s stifling plain and simple.