2 ms·
If you have automated rule enforcement, then you already have a formal specification of your rules, and informing the user of what rule they have broken should
by OkayPhysicist 5y ago
If you have automated rule enforcement, then you already have a formal specification of your rules, and informing the user of what rule they have broken should be trivial.
If you have humans doing the bans manually, then you already have a human in the loop.
- shadowgovt 5y agoThe appeals process mandate is the part that would add a lot of cost that doesn't currently exist. It puts a human in the loop on the back side of the automated process. And once you add an appeals process, you can expect everybody to attempt to go through it... False positives will of course appeal, and bad actors have no disincentive to appeal for the simple sake of gumming up the system for fun.