4 ms·
> What is sad so, is that the IMHO brilliant Dune encyclopedia was declared non-canon... I hold my own counsel on what is canon: Anything explicitly and direct
by cgriswald 5y ago
> What is sad so, is that the IMHO brilliant Dune encyclopedia was declared non-canon...
I hold my own counsel on what is canon: Anything explicitly and directly written by Frank Herbert. That excludes The Dune Encyclopedia, but I don't think that diminishes it. We shouldn't pretend that it was declared non-canon for any reason other than Brian Herbert and Anderson selling pablum as Dune universe novels.
- hef19898 5y agoWasn't Frank Herbert heavily consulted the Encyclopdia's author? Would have to locate my copy to check... And yes, the Anderson books were the only reason the Encyclopedia was thrown out. Still damn great content, so.
- cgriswald 5y agoMy understanding is that he was somewhat involved and also approved of the Encyclopedia. My interpretation is that his objections to it weren't really objections so much as making clear that he wouldn't be bound by anything in it; and that this is being used to re-write history and make it sound like he disliked the Encyclopedia. > Still damn great content, so. Exactly. It doesn't really matter what a couple of hacks have to say about it.