3 ms·
> Taxes and charity are two completely different things. I couldn't agree more with it. One is a compulsory extortion, another is a voluntary action. > Not su
by ghostwriter 5y ago
> Taxes and charity are two completely different things.
I couldn't agree more with it. One is a compulsory extortion, another is a voluntary action.
> Not sure if you are insinuating that anyone who holds this political position but does not donate money towards the cause are somehow hypocrites?
I'd like to understand why certain people would rather prefer a compulsory extortion for everyone than a voluntary action for themselves and other like-minded people. Even at the level of the mentioned politics, public spending is not especially effective and efficient approach towards funding your causes [1].
[1] https://www.thecity.nyc/2019/4/4/21211167/no-relief-as-pricey-park-bathrooms-put-pressure-on-taxpayers https://www.thecity.nyc/2019/4/4/21211167/no-relief-as-price...
- alkonaut 5y ago> I'd like to understand why certain people would rather prefer a compulsory extortion for everyone than a voluntary action for themselves and other like-minded people I think if you don’t understand that already, it’s likely I can’t help you understand either. I suggest traveling to and reading about functioning welfare states and high-tax societies. Perhaps it’ll clear up. If not, reading and traveling is rarely a waste!
- ghostwriter 5y ago> I think if you don’t understand that already, it’s likely I can’t help you understand either. But expressing your reasoning here doesn't have to be predicated purely on your percieving my capacity to understand it. You could just express it in a token of good will. I've switched three countries with three different languages so far. Coming from one of the currently non-existing Soviet states, I think I've got a pretty useful cultural and political background to understand and see the real difference between welfare- and small-government states than most of westerners by birth out there.
- alkonaut 5y agoI'm just one data point, and I'm all for a large-ish government and high-ish taxes but I'd be happy to answer a concrete question if you have one. Was it approximately "why would anyone vote for higher taxes to fund a larger state", was that correct? You should be able to find around 50% of the people around you ready to vote for that (regardless of what the current tax level is!)! That was my point - given that's basically the position of half the humans around you are you seriously wondering that, or is it rhetorical?