3 ms·
How is this not a threat in the EU or anywhere? Yes it's made worse by the litigious nature of the US, but that's beside the point IMO. The sender is clearly im
by desmosxxx 5y ago
How is this not a threat in the EU or anywhere? Yes it's made worse by the litigious nature of the US, but that's beside the point IMO. The sender is clearly implicating that there will be consequences for not responding. Even if this is the law and the sender is within their rights, it's still a threat.
The entire thing is even worse because most of these websites were not under any obligation to reply but didn't know as much as they weren't experts in the law
In your view, what purpose does informing someone of a law related to their compliance serve?
- jhgb 5y agoSaying on the basis of which regulation you're asking for something just isn't considered a threat where I live, period. People who want to make threats actually make threats. > In your view, what purpose does informing someone of a law related to their compliance serve? Well, obviously, in this case, it was about the time period expected. If you have reasonable assumption that your request is not common (for example businesses may plausibly receive far fewer GDPR requests then they receive product warranty requests), then communicating the expectation seems like a prudent thing to do since the other party is less likely to be familiar with it.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- desmosxxx 5y ago> time period expected. A legal expectation, no?