4 ms·
So, after Google/YouTube have been aided in growth by the safe harbor clause, they now think that site owner responsibility is not such a bad thing after all?
by bvxhl 5y ago
So, after Google/YouTube have been aided in growth by the safe harbor clause, they now think that site owner responsibility is not such a bad thing after all?
Sounds more to me that they are pulling up the ladder to impede competitors.
- _notathrowaway 5y agoI belive this is a really good take on the matter, and somehow you are the first person I see bringing it up.
- not2b 5y agoThe EFF has raised this issue repeatedly (that stringent requirements on content filtering will be an advantage to the large players who can afford to do it).
- judge2020 5y agoIt's very likely you only start getting 'requests' from 3-letter agencies asking you to scan content once you reach some large mass of hosted content, especially since the technology for even doing so is locked up, with NCMEC and Microsoft being the arbitrators for who gets to use it: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/PhotoDNA/CloudService https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/PhotoDNA/CloudService