3 ms·
- lower runtime overhead - quicker deployment time - smaller image foot print Firecracker beg to differ. I think you can do virtualisation and have all th
by StreamBright 5y ago
- lower runtime overhead
- quicker deployment time
- smaller image foot print
Firecracker beg to differ. I think you can do virtualisation and have all three you listed.
- laumars 5y agoSure. But for every edge case where virtualisation bridges the gap, there will be containerisation solutions that further the gap too. Also I’m not really in the mood to engage in a dumb flame war. I’m just answering the question as to why some people favour containers for some workflows. If firecracker works for you then keep at it.