I tend to take every theory seriously. I think it’s important to do so, to either prove or disprove. I also often find “conspiracy theorists” are the most educa

I tend to take every theory seriously. I think it’s important to do so, to either prove or disprove. I also often find “conspiracy theorists” are the most educated on a given topic. That’s not to say I often agree. But it’s a really interesting exercise to explore their theories. You’ll often learn an abundance yourself. I did that recently regarding the election hacking claims: https://austingwalters.com/mike-lindell-and-china-hacking-american-elections/ https://austingwalters.com/mike-lindell-and-china-hacking-am... I ended up narrowing down who it was who was perpetrating the claims and validated my theory it’s probably BS. In this case, the WEF and IMF have a lot of the same participants and have run hacking simulations. That seems reasonable to me imo. That said, it’s fairly clear why people believe there’s a conspiracy with the IMF — https://quotefancy.com/quote/1275693/Henry-Kissinger-Who-controls-the-food-supply-controls-the-people-who-controls-the-energy https://quotefancy.com/quote/1275693/Henry-Kissinger-Who-con... There’s probably something there, but it’s not clear the cyber attack simulations are anything related to a conspiracy. China and the west’s adversaries have a pretty clear incentive to replace / destroy the IMF. They could do that via hacking.