> The fact is that no one is actually checking anything. Its all based on trust. I don't trust your statement. I don't trust your statement because everythin

> The fact is that no one is actually checking anything. Its all based on trust. I don't trust your statement. I don't trust your statement because everything I've done to actually check on thing shows it to be correct. Again, does North Dakota exist? Does New Zealand exist? Was the universe created last Thursday? > but you need to verify information before you actively promote or parrot it. I have verified it to my satisfaction. Just because you are not satisfied does not mean I am parroting thing. I have never been to New Zealand. I am satisfied that it exists. > should we accept any old story that purports to explain things? Absolutely not. Which is why I don't accept your story that "It's all based on trust.