3 ms·
> The most prominent example would be evil mode but there is also viper and several newer implementations of modal editing and features first dreamed up for vim
by 1_player 5y ago
> The most prominent example would be evil mode but there is also viper and several newer implementations of modal editing and features first dreamed up for vim.
Similar to != compatible. Evil-mode is inspired by vim, but you can't use it on vim. Elisp isn't written to be as compatible as vimscript as possible. They are two distinct projects.
GNOME wants to become its own distinct project, not because of superiority or dislike about other DEs, but because they want to go for strict conventions and exotic ideas which are often at odds with other DEs philosophies. I am still waiting to hear why this is so bad. I don't hear anyone hating ElementaryOS for trying to do the same.
- michaelmrose 5y agoThere have always been many distinctly different graphical environments for Linux. Being incompatible doesn't serve this goal which is why you don't need something like wine to run gnome apps because they are executing in the same environment as say KDE apps. This ceasing to be would have to be regarded as extraordinary and undesirable. It's hard enough to get people to support Linux.