4 ms·
I'm surprised the article doesn't mention phases or the idea of projective Hilbert spaces. The QM formulation it gives is well known ambiguous: the condition <φ
by rnhmjoj 5y ago
I'm surprised the article doesn't mention phases or the idea of projective Hilbert spaces. The QM formulation it gives is well known ambiguous: the condition <φ|φ>=1 does not determine φ, because it's also satisfied by any other state ψ=exp(iλ)φ with λ real. So, the state of a physical system is really described by the ray (equivalent class) of all state vectors differing by a phase.
I wonder if this has any consequence on their reasoning and conclusions.
- alubeixu 5y agoYou can work in projective space or with any representative in the full space, or keeping track of global phases, it really doesn't make any difference. But all physicists are aware of this afaik. As you say, it is well known, so no need to mention it.