4 ms·
> morally invalid Genuinely curious, because that sounds so definitive; so what's the way to determine whether a viewpoint is morally valid or invalid? I'm not
by overeater 5y ago
> morally invalid
Genuinely curious, because that sounds so definitive; so what's the way to determine whether a viewpoint is morally valid or invalid? I'm not talking about this specific example about military-commercial funding, but how to consider statements like "If I don't do it, someone else will" on its own. The justifications are forms of reasoning, so I imagine there's an overarching principle to evaluate these ways of reasoning?
- contingencies 5y agoIndeed. It's called the asshole precept, aka. "Do unto others", "Leave the world a better place", "Ahimsa", etc. Most cultures have a version of it, including agglomerating meta-traditions such as Baháʼí, which is testament to its popularity across time and space.
- overeater 5y agoThat's a great answer. I can see it that way now. Thanks.