5 ms·
The one on the prior blockchain will have an earlier timestamp from thousands of nodes. Did you really think this through? Yes, you can scam people on other cha
by vmception 5y ago
The one on the prior blockchain will have an earlier timestamp from thousands of nodes. Did you really think this through? Yes, you can scam people on other chains, but of course if you are writing this you consider the earlier timestamp version to be a scam as well. You can still acknowledge the difference.
- Buttons840 5y agoI mean, those earlier timestamps are on a different blockchain my users don't care about. My personal blockchain with 2 users says I bought the Mona Lisa NFT in 1993. But nobody cares, because to almost everyone my blockchain is just some random "other blockchain". I don't have as many nodes, how many do I need?
- vmception 5y agoThere are better jokes possible. Who came to your blockchain and sold it to you? Is there a bridge to move value from the existing blockchains over to yours? Who runs the bridge? Alternatively is there an exchange that allows withdrawals to your blockchain, again, to move value there for transfer at all? Its not just about the nodes.
- tshaddox 5y agoI’m not sure I follow your point. You could hypothetically create an art auction that only seems super cheap copies of famous paintings on newsprint. People could decide to join your community and decide to only value your cheap copies, and not value the original paintings at all. Setting aside the likelihood of this actually happening, even assuming it did happen what have you demonstrated?
- gopher_space 5y agoWarhol and Lichtenstein were right? McLuhan knew what he was talking about?
- root_axis 5y agoThe timestamp is meaningless. For example, the timestamp for these Olive Garden NFTs will be dated before anything that might be minted by Olive Garden's corporate owners.
- vmception 5y agoThey also wont be the same
- root_axis 5y agoWhat's your point?
- vmception 5y agoOlive Garden’s corporate owners wont do NFT’s of these low quality images of their locations and pretend its ownership of one. So because their wouldn't be a collision it doesn't matter that the non-owner minted these earlier. Even if they did, to be ironic, the social proof from that official issuance, would attract all the value, ignoring these. Which has also happened before in the NFT space.
- root_axis 5y agoHow would I know that this site was not operated by the corporate owners without the explicit disclaimer the creators put in?