4 ms·

I think that with sufficiently advanced technology, there would be immense understanding of nature resulting in elimination of any need to be in conflict with t

I think that with sufficiently advanced technology, there would be immense understanding of nature resulting in elimination of any need to be in conflict with the nature because one would simply solve their needs by enveloping or integrating with nature instead of going against it.

jollybean 5y ago
Yes, but 'Enough Tech and Knowledge to do Whatever Whenever at Planetary Sale' ... that's a million years away. In the meantime, to answer the OP's question, the issue is that there is an inflection point at which man has enough tech to start changing nature, by disrupting parts of those systems. That's probably huge distinction between most of Europe/Asia and the rest of the world in the Columbian era. Aboriginals cultures mostly did not have the ability to shape the land (and where they had they tech, they did disrupt). Forget narratives one way or the other - they were by and large 'way behind'. And things took a an even bigger, massive jump when we harnessed fossil fuels. The glamorization of 'In Concert With Nature' is I think mostly just the fact that they didn't have the power to do anything otherwise.