4 ms·
Your projectile idea is unlikely to be the reason, because I am allowed to have a book in my hands during takeoff and landing, and I am allowed to have a Kindle
by jzwinck 5y ago
Your projectile idea is unlikely to be the reason, because I am allowed to have a book in my hands during takeoff and landing, and I am allowed to have a Kindle in my hands so long as it is "off." But I am not allowed to have it "on."
- p_l 5y agoIt's a compromise, and flight crew does try to use it this way. That said, consumer devices were regularly found to radiate in all kinds of crazy bands, and would not pass requirements for non-interference in aviation, but pass for home/office environment. The planes where you have wifi internet etc. are certified that they won't have issues with home/office rated equipment. Aviation is really a different regulatory domain and a lot of stuff was designed with the idea that there aren't hundreds of unknowable quality transceivers active in the passenger/cargo area. P.S. The uncompromising option is to pack sedated passengers in pods in racks, and believe me, it's not that uncommon dream among the flight crews.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 5y agoAs someone who has regularly done transatlantic flights I would love the sedated pod in a rack option as a passenger. Actually, in general I would prefer that option to awake in nearly every passenger flight scenario.
- p_l 5y agoHear, hear. I generally am lucky enough on shorter flights to fall asleep sometime around safe climb is achieved and wake up for landing, but transatlantic is a PITA.