3 ms·
I'd love it if the Wayback Machiine were less touchy/more reliable. The failure mode I see very often is that the frontend apparently doesn't know what the bac
by msla 5y ago
I'd love it if the Wayback Machiine were less touchy/more reliable.
The failure mode I see very often is that the frontend apparently doesn't know what the backend's doing: The part which ingests URLs and tells you what URLs have been archived does not know what archives the backend has, so it will tell you a page has been archived and give you a link to the archive, but when you click the link, it tells you it does not have the page archived, oh, look, it exists online, would you like to archive it now? Archive it again, and it will tell you that you can only archive a page once every 45 minutes. If you're a weird little obsessive like myself, you go through this process a half-dozen times for one page before it acknowledges that, yes, it does have the page archived (once, mind you) and you can actually see it.
While I'm filing bitch reports...
The Wayback Machine apparently loves setting cookies. It will set cookies until it has exceeded its own ability to accept cookies, at which point it will give you a blank page and you have to look in the developer console to figure out that it sent you a "too many cookies" error in the response header. I've had to force my browsers to not accept any cookies from the Internet Archive to fix this.