3 ms·
Rosetta is actually more efficient than Wine when it comes to graphics, which is the biggest bottleneck for playing games on Wine. Metal calls are pretty much
by fathyb 5y ago
Rosetta is actually more efficient than Wine when it comes to graphics, which is the biggest bottleneck for playing games on Wine.
Metal calls are pretty much kept as-is, whereas Wine has to translate DirectX operations to OpenGL or Vulkan, like VirtualBox or Parallels.
But it's true that when it comes to raw CPU power, Wine very likely provides the best performance.
- Wowfunhappy 5y agoWell, I feel like running a Vulkin-native game in Wine would be a better comparison here, but I could see the counterargument.