> "Some parts of VSCode are MIT Licensed - not all of it" The source code, the editor are. This is like Oracle releasing a proprietary plugin for EMACS and dis

> "Some parts of VSCode are MIT Licensed - not all of it" The source code, the editor are. This is like Oracle releasing a proprietary plugin for EMACS and distributing it on Oracle Linux, and someone saying "this is bad, we need FOSS editors!". That wouldn't make EMACS not-FOSS. (Is it trolling of me to point out that of course the thing people actually want is not the FOSS bit? There are dozens of editors, people want features not ideology)