4 ms·
Can't take this seriously because it's missing the ubiquitous ZF-1. https://fifth-element.fandom.com/wiki/Zorg_ZF-1_Pod_Weapon https://fifth-element.fandom.com
by ggambetta 5y ago
Can't take this seriously because it's missing the ubiquitous ZF-1.
https://fifth-element.fandom.com/wiki/Zorg_ZF-1_Pod_Weapon https://fifth-element.fandom.com/wiki/Zorg_ZF-1_Pod_Weapon
- haunter 5y agoIt's there? http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Fifth_Element,_The#AKS-74U_.28as_the_.22Zorg_ZF-1_Pod_Weapon_System.22.29 http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Fifth_Element,_The#AKS-74U_.28as_t...
- ggambetta 5y agoStrange, my many searches didn't find it. I stand corrected.
- fartattack 5y ago
- zepto 5y agoWhy not add it yourself?
- cgriswald 5y agoOn the other hand, I fully support the exclusion of the weirding module[0] from David Lynch's Dune. [0] - https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Weirding_Module https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Weirding_Module
- Mathnerd314 5y agoWell it doesn't have Dune at all, AFAICT. 28k pages vs 595k movies on IMDB, it's going to miss some. And they seem to have quite restrictive policies on who can edit, what counts as a gun, etc.
- Andrew_nenakhov 5y ago... These sardaukars are still salty after the freemen defeated them using weirding modules.
- SergeAx 5y agoTIL: "Each function of the ZF-1 demonstrated by Zorg was a separate prop which only had that one function". This is entirely obvious after thinking a bit, but still great example of movie editing for fooling audience.
- Natsu 5y agoDoes it only have released movies? I was trying to find Alec Baldwin's infamous gun from Rust.
- SV_BubbleTime 5y agoF.LLI Pietta Long Colt 45 Revolver It’s a 1960s replica of an 1880 Colt SAA (the Peacemaker). Aside from what Baldwin is ridiculously claiming, that the gun went off without him pulling the trigger, Pietta built these in the 1960s with trigger bars. You very much can not get that gun to fire without pressing the trigger. So unless the gun was modified or somehow broken, he had to pull the trigger. FWIW, I didn’t blame actor Alec Baldwin until he started lying about the incident, but still blame Producer Alec Baldwin who is ultimately responsible.
- Natsu 5y agoI heard somewhere--I think from claims in one of the lawsuits that was filed--that he might've been playing with the hammer. If he had the trigger already depressed, he might've fired it by releasing the hammer without technically pulling the trigger (because it was already pulled). Or at least that's one theory. We will have to see what goes on in court and hear what they say after examining the actual gun. I'm surprised he didn't offer to settle before this was even filed. From everything I've heard from lawyers discussing this, there's almost no question that he's civilly liable for this.
- SV_BubbleTime 5y agoThat is possible. But still very much counts as pulling the trigger. Holding the trigger and manipulating the hammer is how “fanning” works. The old times cowboy fast hip fire technique.
- Natsu 5y agoYeah, the only question is whether Alec knows that or not. He doesn't seem very clued in about gun safety and has said some very odd things to the press, which is also horribly inadvisable from a legal perspective. I wonder what he'll do if he ends up having to take the stand in a civil trial.