4 ms·
Named arguments exist, https://hackage.haskell.org/package/named-0.3.0.1/docs/Named.html https://hackage.haskell.org/package/named-0.3.0.1/docs/Named... That's
by light_hue_1 5y ago
Named arguments exist, https://hackage.haskell.org/package/named-0.3.0.1/docs/Named.html https://hackage.haskell.org/package/named-0.3.0.1/docs/Named... That's just one example.
But yes. Optional arguments are a big problem at scale. And laziness is the worst antifeature I could imagine.
But. You can disable laziness and get great performance. You just need to be careful when using libraries and pick ones that have the right strictness.
A strict Haskell would be a killer language.
- pharmakom 5y ago> You just need to be careful when using libraries and pick ones that have the right strictness. Honestly a deal breaker > A strict Haskell would be a killer language. PureScript may be this language!
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]