The only thing that 'excites' me in DragonflyBSD is their HammerFS - which works and its OK - but its not as usable and simple as manipulating ZFS with zfs(8) a

The only thing that 'excites' me in DragonflyBSD is their HammerFS - which works and its OK - but its not as usable and simple as manipulating ZFS with zfs(8) and zpool(8) commands ... Besides that I do not see anything special on DragonflyBSD ... I have read that they have very sophisticated and fast SMP implementation ... but a lot things just are absent there - like on OpenBSD land. No virtualization for example ... while FreeBSD has *VirtualBox* and *Bhyve* and *Xen DOM0* ... *WINE* probably does not work (or does not work well) as last WINE commits for DragonflyBSD are from almost a decade ago: - https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=DragonFly https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=search&h=HEAD&st=c... FreeBSD also has *VNET Jails* while DragonflyBSD only has 'classic' Jails. FreeBSD comes with GEOM for storage which is just great - https://is.gd/bsdstg https://is.gd/bsdstg - more here. I myself also wrote *lsblk(8)* implementation for FreeBSD - this is also missing on DragonflyBSD. Hope that helps.