> It's an impossible comparison to make. And yet Nature published Comparing the responses of the UK, Sweden and Denmark to COVID-19 using counterfactual modell

> It's an impossible comparison to make. And yet Nature published Comparing the responses of the UK, Sweden and Denmark to COVID-19 using counterfactual modelling in August[1]. It's not as if that's the only paper making comparisons, even if we only look in Nature. > A younger population, with a better healthcare system may have fared better if we didn't lock down. I live in Japan, are you going to tell me it's a younger population? Or perhaps you'll make some claim about the healthcare system here based on… what I could not say as you have yet to give any indication of how your notions are backed, other than by political, tribal concerns. > I'm not a scientist, so I can't show you specific papers to back up my assumptions. As I've shown, one simple search should've turned up something, as I have a whole host of results. Biases should not go unchallenged, especially not through wilful ignorance. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95699-9 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95699-9 Edit: formatting