3 ms·

You're suggesting that the linked judicial order[1] is faked, then? [1] https://www.scribd.com/document/538389544/Action-Order-Man-Kwan-Ng-v-Edward-Elmhurst-He

• gizmo385 5y ago
  No, merely that the epoch times is a rag not worthy of citing. If you want to cite the primary source, then just do that.
  • masonic 5y ago
    >epoch times is a rag Then certainly you can cite, say, one factual error they have published this week. Or month? Or does "rag" simply mean "doesn't parrot the narrative I prefer"?