4 ms·
One was provided already by another poster. I don't even need to give more because that should be sufficient. But if you want to dig further, you should look a
by csee 5y ago
One was provided already by another poster. I don't even need to give more because that should be sufficient.
But if you want to dig further, you should look at the timeline of the WHO's actions and see how slow they were to recommend masks, recommend border closures, and declare a pandemic, then ask yourself if they helped or hurt our efforts to contain COVID throughout 2020. No citation is needed for that, it's all in the public domain - their press conferences and their Twitter.
- valtism 5y agoI don't think any of what you are saying here amounts to any sort of corruption.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- csee 5y agoRead the article. The management of WHO covered up sexual abuse, up until an investigative journalist blew it open. Yes, they are a deeply corrupt organization.
- arcticbull 5y agoThat's not corruption as it pertains to their objectives though. That's a crime, one that should be punished, obviously. It doesn't have anything to do with the primary objectives of the WHO, especially not as it pertains to for instance COVID. Corruption would be, hypothetically, taking payoffs or bribes to avoid doing their jobs. You have not, and nor has anyone else here, offered evidence of corruption.
- csee 5y agoWell I just read the definition of corruption as dishonesty for gain, and this cover-up fits the bill. Even if they don't fit that definition, they're a broken and grossly incompetent organization that covers up their own criminality, with no mechanism for accountability.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]