2 ms·
No need to be defensive, I agree with you. Both sides are valid. But according to the OP employers want to kill WFH, not vice versa. I will say though thinki
by nightski 5y ago
No need to be defensive, I agree with you. Both sides are valid. But according to the OP employers want to kill WFH, not vice versa.
I will say though thinking back to those times I was younger and more naive. I was a slave to that employer, often there until 8-9 at night. My life revolved around them. It wasn't healthy.
- codegeek 5y agoNo worries. I am also not arguing for office only and if employers are trying to kill WFH completely, that is a bad move and will not work.